Page 11 - IRMSA Risk Report 2020
P. 11

CHANGES  IN  LEGISL ATION  AND  REGUL ATIONS


                          T OP  CHALLENGES                                TO P  TREAT MENT S

              •   Unconstitutional  changes  to  legislation  and  •  Robust  and  open  debate  and  obtaining  inputs
                  regulations to serve different (political) agendas.  from  relevant  stakeholders  before  promulgating
              •   Regulators’ lack of proper analysis of the impact/s of  legislation.
                  proposed legislative changes.               •   Active  lobbying  by  affected  parties  and
              •   Companies  are  unprepared  for/unaware  of     stakeholders to influence the legislative changes to
                  legislative changes.                            achieve a mutually beneficial outcome.
                                                              •   The  performance  of  scenario  analyses  to
                                                                  demonstrate  and  understand  the  impact  of
                                                                  legislative changes.
                                                              •   Companies  should  ensure  that  business  strategy
                                                                  is aligned with regulatory change and take future
                                                                  sustainability into account.


                 ILL-C ONCEIVED  NHI  POLIC Y  AND / OR  SUB-OPTIM AL  IMPLEMENTATION

                          T OP  CHALLENGES                                TO P  TREAT MENT S


               •   Significant  capital  funding  (at  low  rates)  is  •  Call on big business to set up low cost/affordable
                   required  to  build  proper  public  health  care  capital  funding  to  build  much  needed  health
                   facilities.                                     care facilities.
               •   Shortage  of  the  general  practitioners  and  •  Robust  stakeholder  engagement  plans  and
                   specialists required to service all the people in SA.  public awareness campaigns.
               •   High levels of distrust and resistance to change in  •  Set  up  proper  governance,  controls  and
                   both public and private sectors.                monitoring  systems  to  ensure  appropriate
               •   Increased potential of “underservice” to save costs  service levels and manage the potentially higher
                   and stay within budget.                         corruption risk.
               •   Inability to eradicate systemic corruption and/or  •  Leverage  technology  to  ensure  control  of
                   deal with labour issues.                        information, service levels, and costs across the
                                                                   value chain.


                      ILL-C ONCEIVED  L AND  REFORM  POLIC Y  AND / OR  SUB-OPTIM AL
                                                 IMPLEMENTATION
                          T OP  CHALLENGES                                TO P  TREAT MENT S

               •   Historical  conflicts,  emotional  sensitivities,  and  •  Basing  the  land  reform  policy  on  principles
                   politicisation of the land issue combined with the  of  inclusivity,  social  cohesion,  social  compact
                   lack of a national compact to respond and treat  building, and benefits for all.
                   such conflicts.                             •   Continuous,  robust,  and  clear  communication
               •   Uncertainty around the best way to define and   to  extensive  stakeholder  groupings  to  build  a
                   then implement land reform.                     common purpose.
               •   Lack of skills, competencies, and capabilities to  •  Establishment  of  an  empowered  and  enabled
                   execute any specific land reform policy.        Land  Reform  Agency  that  is  legitimate  and
               •   The  “wait  and  see”  approach  adopted  by  the  credible in the eyes of all affected stakeholders
                   private  sector,  instead  of  robust,  constructive  and society at large.
                   participation to achieve a common purpose.  •   Appointing  honest,  credible,  and  competent
               •   Absence of legal precedent to inform policy on  individuals in all public sector entities that play a
                   issues of land reform.                          role in land reform.
                                                               •   Strong  leadership  in  all  levels  of  society  –
                                                                   including  public  sector,  private  sector,  labour,
                                                                   and civil society.





                                                                                                              1  0
   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16